Wednesday, September 28, 2016

America's Infrastructure Is Crumbling

Image Source:Flickr

This week Congress once again failed to pass a continuing resolution to fund the government. One of the issues they continue to push down the road is the issue of infrastructure funding.

Most of our funding for infrastructure comes from sales tax on gasoline. As vehicles become more efficient, less gas is needed and funding for our infrastructure diminishes.

The American Society of Civil Engineers’(ASCE) most recent report card on the U.S. infrastructure scored a D+. And according to the World Economic Forum, the U.S. now ranks 16th overall in quality of infrastructure, behind other major countries like France, Spain and Japan. According to the ASCE report, an estimated $1.7 trillion in additional spending is needed by 2020 for our surface transportation to be adequately improved.

A recent report showed that there are at least 61,000 bridges which are structurally deficient and in need of serious repair or replacement. These bridges see tens of millions of drivers daily and there is no telling when the next one will fail.


Our roads, for example, require a lot of maintenance, especially after long winters. Potholes and rough roads cost drivers an estimated $324 a year on car repairs. Many cold-weather states and cities sink much of their transportation budgets into repairing these roads yearly.

Right now 42% of America’s city highways are considered highly congested. And that costs our nation's economy an estimated $101 billion in wasted time and fuel each year. Maintaining our infrastructure is also very costly.

Everyone in Congress will tell you that they are very concerned about the nation's crumbling infrastructure, but no one can agree on an approach to repairing it. Short resolutions have pased

The biggest issue is how to fund it. The most commonly suggested plan would be to raise the gas tax a few cents in order to bolster federal Highway Trust Fund revenue. House Republican leaders want to change corporate tax laws that encourage U.S. companies to park foreign profits overseas and use this revenue to fully pay for highway and transit aid. The change would allow corporations to transfer money back to the U.S. at a lower tax rate.

Senator Bernie Sanders, former presidential hopeful, introduced a bill last year which would have increased infrastructure spending by $1 trillion over five years. "My legislation puts 13 million people to work repairing the backlog of infrastructure projects all across this country,” Sanders said. “These projects require equipment, supplies and services, and the hard-earned salaries from these jobs will be spent in countless restaurants, shops and other local businesses. It’s no surprise that groups across the political spectrum – from organized labor to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – agree that investing in infrastructure will pay dividends for future generations.”

One suggestion by former republican presidential hopeful Ohio Governor John Kasich, was that the federal government decrease their gas tax, thereby allowing individual states with greater infrastructure needs to increase their own gas taxes accordingly, thereby cutting out the middle man and making sure the funding goes to the states with the greatest need.

"Instead of sending our gas tax money to Washington, where federal bureaucrats skim some off the top to pay for their own agencies, Congress should dramatically cut the 18.4 cents-per-gallon federal gas tax to just a few cents per gallon — just enough to pay for interstate connectivity and other safety concerns. States would then be free to set their own gas tax rates, aligned to their own needs as identified by their own residents, communities, and leaders."

For years, transportation experts have called for a massive investment to save a network of roads, bridges and transit systems that has fallen into disrepair. Will Congress work to solve this problem now or punt the question down the road again?


Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Readers poll: Who Are You Planning to Vote For?

Image Source Flickr Creative Commons


Who Are You Planning to Vote For?

Donald Trump
Hillary Clinton
Gary Johnson
Jill Stein
Evan McMullin
Someone Else
Poll Maker

Saturday, March 5, 2016

The GOP Debates Are a Joke. Here Is How to Fix Them.


Image Source: Flickr
After watching nearly every GOP debate for the 2016 election I've come to the conclusion that we need to fundamentally change the way the debates are run. Because when they yell over each other, ratings go up and we know that these networks only care about the ratings. The focus should be on policy and experience, instead it's about entertainment. These debates are not centered on who is the best choice for president, but who gives the best gotcha line. Even the post debate coverage is often short clips of jabs that one candidate did against another. 

Here are 7 suggestions to fundamentally change the way the debates are run:

1. Debates not controlled by network news. Whether it's CSPAN, or an independent group, we need to get the networks out of the debates. They want their ratings to go up, not for us to have high quality debates. All networks shall have access to broadcast the debates. Also all debates will be broadcast live on the internet, without a paid subscription. There will be  time for a break in which ads can be played, but they must not be of a political nature.
2. Mute the other candidates mics when a candidate is speaking or the moderator is asking a question. No one can talk over another candidate, and candidates cannot get into shouting matches.
2. All questions must be related to a policy question, or a candidate's experience. No more questions about what someone else said. 
3. No response time for personal attacks, and all personal attacks reduce future talking time by 30 seconds per attack. Policy attacks are open game. Character attacks are off limits.
4. Once the field narrows to 5 candidates, allot a longer time for each initial response. One minute is hardly enough time to cover important policy topics.
5. The audience is to be quiet or removed from the debate. This has been done before. There is no need to have an audience and the booing and cheering interrupts and wastes time. Mics should not be placed to pick up the Audience
6. Each candidate will be asked an equal number of questions and time to speak. Time of each candidates speaking will be measured and if one candidate is getting less time, they will be allotted additional time to answer a question.
7. 20 seconds to the end of the time that is allotted per question the candidates will be given a warning buzz. 10 seconds after their allotted time their mics are muted.

If we treat the debates like they're a circus or a wrestling match then they are only good for entertainment. If we treat our nation's selection of the next president of the United States with respect, we will possibly see a rise of better policies, and maybe more civility in politics. 

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Who Won Tonight's Debate?

The final debate before the nation's first primary in New Hampshire is in the books. Who do you think won tonight's debate? Who lost? Who had the best moment? Vote now and tell us your thoughts in the comments.


Who do you think won tonight's debate?

Chris Christie
Ted Cruz
Donald Trump
John Kasich
Marco Rubio
Jeb Bush
Ben Carson
Do Quizzes

Sunday, January 17, 2016

10 Qualities of a Great President

The role of the President of the United States is one of the most demanding and influential positions in the world. A great president must possess a unique blend of skills, character, and vision to lead effectively. Here are ten essential qualities that define a great president:

From my observations of U.S. history, I would say there are 10 qualities of a great president. They are:


1. A love of our country It would be rare to find a president who truly does not love their country, but it truly should be the number one requirement for the job. This person will be a parental figure for our country, bringing counsel and comfort. They will be the example to all other leaders within our country in the way they should act. Good leaders lead from love, not from greed or lust for power. They truly love everyone in that country, and want to help bring all to higher heights. If you look at George Washington, FDR, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln, I can't think of many men who loved their countries more. All of them showed that love in their leadership in war and in peace. Because of their love of our country, they sought to move us forward 

2. Vision of the future Each president must look to the future with a clear vision of what America will become. Presidents need to look beyond here and now, seeing the vast future of possibilities and framing a future for the country. The problems they must solve are not just the current ones that are occurring, but possible future ones. Ronald Reagan clearly saw the end of the Cold War, and prepared our country for that future. John Adams knew the only way our country would be secure and truly independent of European powers was for us to have a strong military, especially a navy. Our founders understood the need for a strong but limited government of the people. Each great president's vision of the future has led us into new heights as a country, and if we work to elect another great president, we can reach higher heights than ever before.

3. Accountability and adaptability Great presidents understand that mistakes happen, and they own up to those mistakes. They also understand there is a limit to their power. Understanding that their accountability is to the people, they are open and honest about their intentions and their actions. Great presidents own their mistakes, and then adapt to meet the needs of the time. They work to make our nation better by finding ways to be better leaders.  

4. Respect Often respect is overlooked in our search for a president. When I speak of respect, I am referring to respect for the office of the president, respect for the people who have entrusted you with great power, and respect for those who disagree with you. Too often we look at political correctness as the problem in Washington DC, but in my opinion it is a lack of respect that I find most disturbing. To have respect for someone who disagrees with you means you are willing to hear them out, and consider their opinion as well. Under the Washington administration, he leaned on Congress heavily, understanding that his presidency required power from the will of the people as expressed by their elected representatives.

5. Empathy and Compassion Great presidents bring people together. They don't blame everything on the previous administration or the opposing party. They always have their eye on one single idea: unity brings us strength. We can only build a greater nation on stronger bonds of unity.

6. Courage As commander in chief and chief executive, it is extremely important that a president have courage. Every presidency has, and every future presidency will, face tough challenges with the potential for terrifying outcomes. Millions of lives will be at stake, and with that comes the need to be courageous and strong in the face of those challenges. During his tenure as president, Lincoln faced a country torn apart, and throughout all of the trials and disappointments he held us together with courage in the face of opposition.

7. Honesty In our basic social contract as a society, we must remember that honesty and integrity are essential to our survival as a nation. As we come together, we trust each other and rely on each other for security and strength. Honesty is essential to trust. Dishonesty breaks the bonds of trust that bind us together as a nation, making us weaker as a whole. 

8. Compassion On the battlefield and here at home, each president must have compassion. Compassion for the mother who loses a son away at war. Compassion for the individual who lost their home to natural disaster. They must have compassion for each individual and see them for who they are-brothers and sisters sharing this planet. As leader of the free world, our nation still shines as an example, and part of that is the compassion and giving that we have shown and continue to show. 

9. Great communicator It’s simply impossible to be a great leader without possessing the skills of a great communicator. Whether you think of FDR, John Adams, JFK, Abraham Lincoln or Ronald Reagan, each of our great president's have been great communicators. Especially in times of trial, we have relied on our presidents to comfort us, strengthen us, and lead us forward through great speeches. Being able to clearly and persuasively articulate policies, goals, and national values is crucial for any president to unite and guide the country

10. Being a servant of the people last of all comes a reminder that they are always here to serve our country, not their own ambition. The position of president is not that of celebrity in chief, but of servant in chief. Each president should remember and respect their office. While selecting a president we should remember that this person will join the ranks of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, JFK, and Reagan.


Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Who Won the Third Republican Debate?

With the third Republican Debate now in the books we have been given a lot to think about. Who do you think won the debate? Vote in the poll and comment with why and who you think might have lost the debate? What did you think of the moderators?


Who Won the Third Republican Debate

Rand Paul
Jeb Bush
Chris Christie
Ted Cruz
Mike Huckabee
John Kasich
Donald Trump
Marco Rubio
Carly Fiorina
Ben Carson
Poll Maker

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

How to Pick a Candidate to Support

Being an informed voter generally means that you have researched the candidates and issues on a ballot before voting in an election. This can take a lot of research, and can be difficult especially in local races, where up until the election you generally won't see anything in newspapers or online about candidates.

With my experience I have decided on a variety of factors I look into before I decide on which candidate I want to support.

The first is consistency, because this shows their integrity as a leader. I look at each candidate's record to see if the record reflects what they have said in the past. I do not discount anyone before I have begun the process, and I try to not allow snap judgements to guide my actions in deciding who to support.

I look at the candidate's experience in politics and the various types of roles and responsibilities that the candidate has had over the course of their business and political career. Sometimes you may want candidates with specific types of experience, such as governors and presidents.

The third thing is that I have a rather extensive list of issues that I believe in and think would be important to prioritize in order to improve society as a whole. So I check the list of issues for each candidate and I generally tend to vote for a candidate who has stated positions on issues that align the best with where I stand on various issues that important to me.

Specific to the presidential race, one group has put together the site ISideWith.com. This site allows you to answer a series of questions in order to determine which candidate matches up with you best on the issues. It is incredibly important to weight the questions based upon your feelings on the issues and to make sure to check the additional answers.

Each of us wants to leave a positive impact on the world we leave behind. We each have our own vision of how to solve the issues facing this country. The more informed we are on candidates and issues, the more I believe we will be able to move forward in the future as a country.


Monday, September 28, 2015

What Is the Donald Trump Tax Plan and What Would it Mean For You?

Image source: Flickr

This morning Donald Trump announced his plan to reform the tax code. The plan cuts rates across the board, similar to the Jeb Bush plan. The plan to pay for this is to cut out loopholes and cap deductions similar to what was done in the 80's. Those earning less than 25,000 will pay no tax at all. For 31 million Americans, they would pay no tax. For the top bracket they would see a tax cut from 39.6% to 25%. The corporate tax rate would be decreased from 35% to 15%.

Trump's plan for the rest of the tax brackets starts with the lowest bracket of 10 percent and would apply to income from the $50,000 - $100,000 range for a married couple. The next bracket is set at 20 percent and  would apply to married couples earning more than $100,000. The plan aims to eliminate the alternative minimum tax and would slash the highest capital gains rate to 20 percent from the current 23.8 percent. Contrary to what he seems to think, this plan would be a massive tax cut for the richest individuals in our country.

Contrary to popular belief the U.S. has one of the most progressive tax codes in the world. more than 40% of Americans pay no federal income tax at all under the current plan so this would not really be any change for them, but it sounds great on the stump. Instead of such high marginal rates,  most other countries use a form of a consumption tax, otherwise known as a VAT. A VAT is basically a sales tax on all new goods.

It would also cut the rate at which overseas profits are returned to the U.S. to 10%. This has been a popular idea that House Republicans have been in favor of for years, and may even include in the Highway Trust Fund talks.

While Trump claims that his plan won't increase the deficit, one might wonder if the increase to hedge funds along with the cuts in overseas taxes, loopholes and deductions will be enough to equal his spending ideas. Trump's immigration plan alone would cost hundreds of billions of dollars and have a negative impact on the economy of over $1.7 trillion.

Last night when he outlined the basics of a healthcare plan he outlined a massive medicaid expansion. It is already anticipated that Medicaid will cost our country $100 billion per year by 2020. If he's not cutting entitlements, then where are his spending cuts coming? He's not planning on cutting military spending, so where is he supposed to make up the difference?

Why is it important to cut the deficit? If these cuts and reductions are not enough, it will only add to our massive $18.4 trillion debt. For reference that's equal to 154,000 per tax payer.

From what we have seen, the Trump tax plan coupled with his spending plans would mean massive deficits. Even with all deductions removed and all loopholes closed (which is not what Trump is suggesting) we would likely widen our deficit with this plan. In fact most experts are saying it would be almost impossible to be revenue neutral with this plan.
While there would certainly be increased  benefits to individuals with this plan and growth to the economy, most estimates believe it would cost us hundreds of billions in lost revenue yearly. It is impossible to have continuous growth, and at some point we would see another recession, and more than likely it will be during the next 4 years statistically speaking . When that hits you can guarantee revenues would plunge and deficits would grow massively.

Nothing in the Donald Trump plan is new. His tax cuts and loophole reductions are almost identical to those proposed by Bush, his overseas profits plan has been around for years. In such a highly touted tax plan that was supposed to be tough on taxes, this plan is one of the weakest attempts that Donald Trump has put out there to reform anything.